The Google toolbar (and others!) is a favorite internet marketing tool of mine. It may not seem like a marketing “tool” to everybody, but when I spend time researching on behalf of a client, Google toolbar is front and center. So, I thought I’d let you in on a most-used trick: searching a site, even if there isn’t a search window on the site.

To begin with, download the Google toolbar (not just the little search window that’s installed in various toolbars) from toolbar.google.com.

Let’s say you Google a word, get a bunch of results and then don’t find the term you were searching for on a particular site that was returned as a result. There’s a little icon available on the Google toolbar that looks like Mr. Magoo (for those of us old enough to remember him!)–or maybe it’s a magnifying glass with spectacles. I have no idea what it’s supposed to be, but it sure is a handy little guy.

(Yahoo toolbar has a similar function available via the “Search Web” drop-down menu.) This function allows you to search for a term “only on the current website.” If it’s not showing on your Google toolbar, right click a blank area of the toolbar and select “customize.” You’ll be able to click/drag the icon onto your toolbar.

So, for example, when I’m researching a particular search phrase for a client’s organic SEO project, I use Mr. Magoo on the various (mostly competitor) sites and get a feel for how they’re using the term. You can check your own web pages to see if your copy is reflecting the search terms that are important to you.

Enjoy this Mr. Magoo search-in-a-search trick. Actually, you can use it from any site without doing a search first…as long as you have the toolbar open.

RefreshWeb just posted a comprehensive list of SEO tips for integrating search marketing into your site. Covers strategy and tactics, with links to all the resources mentioned. Links to free SEO tools.

read more | digg story

This is the first time I’ve used Digg to post, direct to the blog. Like other eager social marketers, we are interested in seeing what happens as we branch out into more engaged, less direct marketing. Well, I have to confess to a little self promotion in doing this post: there wasn’t a Digg that mentions RefreshWeb, so I needed to fix that.

As this blog is written for other people doing web marketing, we will keep you posted on results from our activities. In this case, we are also promoting the free seo tools, tips and tactics via PRWeb in a press release next week, and have mentioned the page in a couple of articles we submitted last month. In January, the seo-tools.php page was the entry page for 30 people…it’s safe to assume these were all new visitors from the articles. The blog was the entry page for 38 people, so that’s encouraging…our audience is more interested in learning from our experience than they are in experimenting on their own…or maybe people are bookmarking or using the RSS feed to keep up with what we’re saying. I’ll report back in a few weeks on the experiment in progress.

I’ve been thinking about keywords and phrases, henceforth referred to as KPs. There’s the pile of a few terms that have the big search numbers up front and a looooooong tail of more specific phrases. The long tail phenomenon is old-hat for the SEO crowd. Most people outside of search marketing probably aren’t familiar with it. They sit down to think of what terms they want to be found for, then come up with a list of terms that are incredibly general. So general, nobody actually ready and willing to buy would be using them. And people come in saying that they want to be number one on the internet for “book” or “computer” or “plastic surgery”.

It’s our job to teach them how search works, that they can’t be number one for those things, and that there are better phrases…KPs that are more specific, that indicate readiness to buy, that may be very specific to their industry area. We see the list and use it as a starting place to find the KPs that will make a difference and will work. But it occurs to me that we shouldn’t just dismiss the general or overly-competitive keywords. The single word KPs need to go, but some of the ones that you won’t win on *but* are likely to be parts of other phrases should get to stick around. Why?

I read that 50% of searches are unique. They’re long, funky strings of words. They aren’t going to show up on the keyword research and tracking tools. But you know what they are going to do? Include the words for the core ideas and features around the product. The one word keywords will wind up in the copy just as you talk about whatever it is you do. Take the term “SEO company”–there are 1,130,000 pages in Google for that term, and WordTracker predicts 996 searches per month on it. That’s some tough competition, but also a whole lot of eyes. Are you going to be #1? Probably not. Especially since it’s SEO–everyone’s site is optimized. But if someone is searching for an Austin SEO company or “Austin SEO company cost of SEO”, there might be enough content on our site about both of those things to make it relevant in one of these longer, unique search queries.

Even more interesting is the difference between “search engine optimization firm” and “search engine optimization company”. The number of searches isn’t too different–about 15%–but there are over 2x the number of competing pages for “search engine optimization company”. It’s just as important to pay attention to what the competition is as to what the predicted search volume is. “SEO firm” has a few more searches than “SEO company, but there are 870,000 more competing pages for “SEO company”. Not that the general terms aren’t worth going after–we’re ranked in the top 50 on Google for “marketing agency”, and it has the highest number of competing pages in this sample with 1.75 million. But that’s because we got the visibility by populating with terms that had it in there already, like terms about our work in B2B web marketing.

So while it’s hard not to squeeze that KP you’re going after in one more time, I think it’s worthwhile to make it a point to include some of those long shots that would be great to have, but so hard to get. Don’t waste the valuable real estate in tags and titles when you could be using the phrases you’re targeting for a good reason, but don’t reject them entirely. Do I have some rule of thumb on percentages and balancing this stuff? Nope. But it is worth taking the extra time and not missing the extra searches you could be getting.

There is a reason they call me Susan the Meticulous. I’m going with the notion it’s a compliment. I say yes, that’s me, and I have the shoes to match.

It is a safe (workplace!*) characterization. I do tend toward research and cross-checks. I perk up when I get an afternoon of View–>Source for a zillion websites to get a sense of how our client’s competitors are coding in support of their organic SEO. I jump with delight when I can get a whole year of client HitsLink data, and it if it includes conversion tracking, well, start thinking tranquilizer dart. And, yes, I always set the keyword research setting to return 1000 results.

I have, however, stumbled around the block enough times to respect some limits, one of those being we can optimize a website, at least on the first round, for a very finite set of terms. We’re talking somewhere between the legal driving age and the age you get dropped from your parent’s health insurance. Inevitably we’ve carefully pruned a list of a few thousand terms to a list of a couple hundred, and now the task is to choose which are the top 10% to optimize.

Usually there’s not a year’s worth of data (sigh) about terms that have worked for the client. OK, usually there is not a day’s worth of data about what terms have worked for the client. We’ve got data about search volumes and numbers of competing pages, but we all have to admit that data has imperfections.

So here’s my question. Other than using some variation of the ratio of search volume to competing pages, what comes to your mind reading this - how would you go about ranking a list of 200 great terms so you can take the top 20 for optimization? No matter your perspective - marketer, SEO expert, any other interested party…I am curious what first comes to your mind.

Because no one knows better than someone who adores manually comparing lists for overlap and gaps that sometimes the best choices have little to do with anything listed in columns and rows. Rather, they come from listening to what strategies seem interesting to folks like you, folks who might make it this far in to an entry in an SEO blog.

So let me know. And until then, I’ll be sorting and pivoting among columns and rows, earbuds tuned to the ambient wood flute and yoga bells channel, looking for clues.

*Please do not go looking for those shoes in my closet. My image would be so blown. I can only imagine the new nickname.