A few months ago, I shared one of those ubiquitous eMarketer charts showing how marketing execs measure the effectiveness of social media. Today, I ran across a new chart showing the top metrics marketers are using for online engagement.

An article in the new Fast Company explains that there is typically little, if any, accountability demanded of social media. And it’s interesting, in terms of actual prospects coming to your site, that the top metric most marketers are using is click-throughs, which shows you the dependence of marketing pros on paid search. While we understand the utility (and handy reporting) of PPC, we’d like to see lead gen and ROI as equally important.

After all, when you’re paying for clicks, and reporting click-throughs without disclosing bounce rates and time on the site, there’s very little real accountability. Since traffic is a direct effect of site optimization, we’re very glad to see that in the #2 position…because marketing drives traffic, and search marketing does it at less expense than any other medium.

We’re increasingly seeing this request from clients, which is to be expected when they’re spending hard cash on soft marketing. This eMarketer table shows the change in the expectations of CMOs from 2010 to 2011 (original source was Austin’s original Bazaarvoice and their CMO Club Survey).

The most interesting change is the DOUBLING of the expectation that increased conversions are a reasonable measure of SMM effectiveness. In B2B marketing, there’s a tripling of the use of increased channel sales as a measure. It’ll be interesting to see how their marketing departments connect cause and effect on those sales!

To put all this in the proper context, consider this pull quote from the published results of the CMO Club Survey: “However, standard ROI metrics proved difficult to measure for many social efforts; only 40% of CMOs surveyed in 2011 successfully tracked ROI on their social initiatives.” Not saying it can’t be done, but it ain’t easy.

Here’s an interesting little table (you go, eMarketer!) on how Internet users share information…how they publish or share. I saw a tweet yesterday that 71% of all tweets are ignored (meaning a 71% drop in Twitter’s imaginary market value, I guess), but it’s fascinating to look at demographic penetration and see what’s really happening. Too bad some other social media weren’t called out, like LinkedIn. Even with all the news and buzz, we can’t get enough data on actual user behavior to inform our clients’ business decisions.

The SEO industry is such fun. With a little research and your site’s analytics package, you can figure out what search terms are bringing folks to your site, and then determine if they get what they wanted once they land on your pages.  This article from Chris Smith, writing for Search Engine Land, gives some really great advice:

1) research what users are entering … not what you call your product/service (“divorce lawyer” rather than “family law lawyer”)
2) use geolocation/geotargeting information to get traffic from the *right* parts of the country/area
3) review the design of your landing pages — a simple tweak could easily bring more conversions (make use of bounce rate data)

Are you using your analytics data to improve your site?  Or, like many, have you implemented, then forgotten it?

I’ll be chairing a panel on Metrics and Measurement at Interactive Austin 2009, and tasked the panel (Ian Strain-Seymour of Apogee Search, Pam O’Neal of BreakingPoint, Michael Wilson of Small World Labs, and Andy Meadows of BudURL fame and Live Oak 360) with coming up with questions we think people will be interested in. We’ve got a couple of search marketing gurus, a couple of guys with companies wrapped around social media marketing, and Pam’s a B2B social media maven, with some great success stories and real-world experience to share.

Please take a few minutes and complete this questionnaire on the topics, focus and specific questions YOU would like to have answered. We will be a much more focused, relevant panel if we can get your input. Hope to see you at IA09!

Click Here to take survey

Ran an interesting little experiment last week, testing the marketing effectiveness of promoting a new free SEO Web Design Tips PDF. Patrick’s blog post was too good not to use as link bait, but as you probably know, you can’t track the downloads of a PDF with on-page analytics tracking code.

However, link shrinking software CAN give you these metrics. Using a $4 account at BudURL, I created two shortened URLs, /SEOWebDesign and /SEOWebDesignTips. Then, I used LinkedIn’s News feature in all the groups I belong to, and sent out an announcement with a link to the new freebie. At the same time, I tweeted the news, using the shorter of the two URLs…at 140 characters, it’s not exactly a press release. I have about 100 followers, and I expected it would get retweeted, hopefully by some of the more popular Twitizens. However, in retrospect, I realized I should have specifically asked that people retweet.

The results? In a week, 271 page visits via LinkedIn, 2 via Twitter. Our site traffic was up 17% for the week, so all-in-all, a decent promotion. I’ll try retweeting the tweet this week with a specific retweet request, and see what we get.

I don’t think I’m any more well-known on the marketing groups on LinkedIn than among my Twitter peeps, but it’s certainly true that the audience self-selected in LinkedIn groups is better targeted. When you think about social media, don’t forget that you still need affinity, interest and motivation to see results…and, that if you measure your results, you can learn a lot about where you should be spending your time.

This is a very interesting time, as we’ve got multiple projects requiring keyword research, and very different requirements:

• Revisiting a national marketer’s site after almost 2 years of client inactivity
• Finessing a technology client’s site after doing our PPC experiments
• Optimizing a couple of new healthcare technology sites
• Starting up a PPC campaign for a client marketing to IT managers

Working on new sites is always like solving a puzzle, because you have to dig into their business quickly, take the keyword research you have, and apply our marketing experience to make recommendations about how the site should be structured. You have to think about the one person making the initial search (when they have a vague idea of how to solve their problem), and then multiple visits from multiple people as the solution is researched, the company is closely inspected, and the search activity becomes a genuine lead. You have to write for awareness, consideration and evaluation, writing good marketing copy, but interweave the best search terms in such a way that the prospect doesn’t notice.

Technology companies are especially challenging, because you use the vocabulary of an engineer, who may be searching on heat dissipation, cooling, fans, heat sinks, or thermal management. (Doesn’t that sound just like an engineer? Optimistic that the problem can be completely controlled, if the right technology can be found.) Over the space of a few months, a leading edge technology will engender more and better searches as the topic gets presented at conferences and in the trades, so we have to stay open to the change, refine our research, and revise our strategy. Quickly adapting to the trend gets you a lot more search, because you’ve already established some authority for the topic.

The PPC campaign for IT managers is also very interesting professionally. The client had been with a PPC agency on the West Coast, but it was obvious that they didn’t do their homework…generic keywords, vague terms, scattershot campaigns, and an absurd offer. After doing technology marketing for 20+ years, I understand that our clients’ prospects are usually very intelligent, marketing-averse people. Fortunately, I’m curious about technology, like to dig into the details, and can generally help the client communicate more clearly–and certainly more persuasively, but without the condescending cuteness of “agency creative.” Taking that experience into the field of paid search, with a classified ad to communicate and one shot to get the prospect to register, requires some real focus (and the willingness to test several approaches). I’m excited about it because I get to work with some very analytical marketers, and because we’re doing an experiment which can be replicated for other clients.

Tech marketing via PPC ads isn’t easy, especially when you know only 20% of the prospects are willing to click on an ad, but if we can generate good results with this tough audience, we know the effort was worthwhile…and we do want all of our clients to succeed. Because search marketing is measurable, it’s all about the metrics and measurement of results…and in taking the time to understand the prospect and doing the keyword research to find the terms that are most likely to convert.

Here are some numbers from page 42 of Groundswell, by Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff:

From a sample of 10,000 online US consumers, the percent who say they do the following things monthly:

Use Twitter – 5%

Write articles, stories, poems, etc, and post them online – 7%

Use RSS – 8%

Listen to podcasts – 11%

Publish / update their own Web pages – 11%

Publish / maintain / or update a blog – 11%

Post ratings / reviews of products or services – 11%

Listen to or download audio/music from other users – 14%

Contribute to online forums or discussion groups – 18%

Add comments to someone’s page on a social networking site – 18%

Update / maintain a profile on a social networking site – 20%

Read blogs – 25%

Read reviews / ratings – 25%

Visit social networking sites – 25%

Read online forums or discussion groups – 28%

Watch video from other users – 29%

Those of us in b2b marketing must keep in mind that business-to-business happens person-to-person. And more and more, folks are getting together online to swap stories in one way or another…are your prospects there?

My son has mastered the cable remote, which means he’s no longer a captive to Boomerang. Suddenly he can take himself to the rest of the kid’s channels…and be doused in their calculated and scheming heaps of commercials for a bunch of crap.

Thank goodness a friend taught us about “What’s The Lie?� About 15 seconds in to a commercial for sneakers, my son shouts “The lie is that those shoes can make you jump as tall as a building and have cartoons coming out of your feet!� The next one is easy – after a couple seconds he says “The lie is that having that will make a lot of cool-looking kids want to hang out with you.�

The third commercial is for markers made to mix a pair of colors when they write…he has some first-hand data here. “That they work after the first time – that’s the lie,� he says as wryly as a child can be wry. The next up is a public service announcement against kid’s smoking. “No lie in this one, right mom? What’s it called again, a PSA?�

What turns out to be the last commercial in this set is for a boxed set of radio hits from the 70’s. A tough one…My candidate for the lie is that the offered price is a bargain, but what comes through visually is more an assertion that dancing to this music will make you happy…and, well, that’s true.

Here at the office, we more and more frequently are in dialogue about how to assess ROI for the not-quite-so-analytics-friendly tactics - like articles and press releases and blogging, for instance - in our quiver as part of a really thorough web marketing campaign. The ROI here – it has to be about trust, right?

The return on investing the time and resources to educate, inform, inspire, and interact with your customers is that they become invested in your relationship. (Yes, there are benefits that translate into something you can show on a graph or include in a report) The point of these tactics that aren’t exactly marketing isn’t about ROI in the way that PPC advertising campaign management is. The return on that is calculable, downloadable directly from the service in a variety of file formats.

The return on actually sitting down and interacting, on giving away information that helps and enriches your customers, that’s the kind of return you can’t show a direct correlation in a quarterly report. But it is the difference between loving and loathing in a lot of cases. If you go in saying you’re interacting and real, but the whole thing is about ROI and selling, your customers will spot the lie faster than my son can tell you breakfast cereal won’t make you friends with cartoon leprechauns.

Have you seen this yet? Interestingly enough, the number of raw searches was up on Yahoo! and Microsoft even though their percentage of the market fell.