<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RefreshWeb &#187; tom parish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/category/tom-parish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog</link>
	<description>Successful Search Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rumors Persist Around Google Buying Twitter &#8211; Somehow, I Have My Doubts</title>
		<link>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2009/04/02/rumors-persist-around-google-buying-twitter-somehow-i-have-my-doubts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2009/04/02/rumors-persist-around-google-buying-twitter-somehow-i-have-my-doubts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom parish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom parish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2009/04/02/rumors-persist-around-google-buying-twitter-somehow-i-have-my-doubts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See this TechCrunch article for more detail on Google and Twitter â€¦If you stop and think about this, it just makes sense to some degree. Google dominates in the area of search. But they donâ€™t do â€˜real-timeâ€™ search of conversations and thatâ€™s where Twitter is strong. If you havenâ€™t used the http://search.twitter.com â€” do so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://marketsofconversation.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/twitter.png" title="twitter" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-345" alt="twitter" height="49" width="210" />See this <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/02/sources-google-in-late-stage-talks-to-buy-twitter/">TechCrunch</a> article for more detail on Google and Twitter â€¦If you stop and think about this, it just makes sense to some degree. Google dominates in the area of search. But they donâ€™t do â€˜real-timeâ€™ search of conversations and thatâ€™s where Twitter is strong. If you havenâ€™t used the <a href="http://search.twitter.com/">http://search.twitter.com</a> â€” do so and youâ€™ll see the power of this new era. Type a few keywords in and watch as it updates for you in real-time, listing the Twitter conversations going on with those keywords.</p>
<p>Weâ€™ll seeâ€¦ rumors are rumors.Â  But just because it makes sense to a bunch of bloggers doesnâ€™t mean it will happen.Â  Personally, Iâ€™d like to see it occur provided Google doesnâ€™t sit on Twitter like it did Blogger and slow the development of the platform.Â  But I have my doubts Google will make the leap because there is so much in flux right now. New developments in social media and social networking tools are happening almost weekly from startups and the majors.</p>
<p>For example, where does FriendFeed fit into the picture with their announcements this coming Monday (April 6th) for major changes?Â  Iâ€™m personally more interested in these developments because itâ€™s a more powerful communication tool then Twitter.Â  And what will Facebook do?Â  My goodness; there are so many changes occurring in the social tools space that 2009 is an exciting year of unpredictable change for most of us. Hardly a new concept though considering the last few years, but thatâ€™s another more philosophic topic.</p>
<p><a href="http://scobleizer.com/2009/04/03/kara-says-no-google-deal-for-twitter/">Robert Scoble</a> seems to be leaning away from the idea that Google would buy Twitter. As you know, opinions are like noses, everyone has one. What do you think?Â  <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090403/sorry-to-get-you-all-a-twitter-but-google-is-not-in-late-stage-talks-to-acquire-the-hot-microblogging-service/">Kara Swisher is reporting that there is no Google deal under discussion to buy Twitter.</a></p>
<p>Tom<br />
Reposted with permission from MarketsofConversation.com Â©2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2009/04/02/rumors-persist-around-google-buying-twitter-somehow-i-have-my-doubts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Questions about Twitter Answered</title>
		<link>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2008/10/21/two-questions-about-twitter-answered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2008/10/21/two-questions-about-twitter-answered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom parish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom parish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2008/10/21/two-questions-about-twitter-answered/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a question I get fairly often: I notice in your Twitter posts/tweets that you have a &#8220;tiny url&#8221;Â for the website postings you want the reader to see. What is TinyURL? How is this different from a regular URL? GOOD question, Bob. Here is the answer: Twitter allows only 140 characters and that include [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a question I get fairly often:</p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 1ex; margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: #cccccc 1px solid" class="gmail_quote">
<p lang="EN-US"><em>I notice in your Twitter posts/tweets that you have a &#8220;tiny url&#8221;Â for the website postings you want the reader to see. What is TinyURL? How is this different from a regular URL?</em></p></blockquote>
<p>GOOD question, Bob. Here is the answer: Twitter allows only 140 characters and that include any URL you may insert into the text. The problem with URLs is many of them are very long and hairy, as you&#8217;ve probably noticed. So &#8230; thanks to TinyURL freeware, here&#8217;s what you do to solve that problem:</p>
<p>1. Go to <a href="http://www.tinyurl.com" title="http://www.tinyurl/">http://www.tinyurl.com</a><br />
2. Scroll down a bit and you&#8217;ll see a box titled: <strong>Enter a long URL to make tiny:</strong><br />
3. Do what it says and click on the Make TinyURL button.</p>
<p>OR, if you want to add TinyURL to your toolbar:<br />
1. Click and drag the following link to your <em>links</em> toolbar: <a href="javascript:void(location.href='http://tinyurl.com/create.php?url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href))" onclick="return false" title="javascript:void(location.href='http://tinyurl.com/create.php?url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href))" onmouseover="window.status='';return true">TinyURL!</a><br />
2. Once this is on your toolbar, you&#8217;ll be able to make a TinyURL at the click of a button. By clicking on the toolbar button, a TinyURL will be created for the page you are currently on.Â <br />
3. Next time you&#8217;re composing a note in Twitter and want to include a page&#8217;s URL, open another window (or tab up) so you can see the content there. Grab the URL and click on the TinyURL thing on your Toolbar, and it will give you the short version you canÂ copy and paste into your tweet.</p>
<p>Try it out. You can always delete your test twitter.</p>
<p>BONUS:<br />
This question also comes upÂ about Twitter:Â <em>Why should a business bother with Twitter?</em> Well, what you have to keep in mind is there are two parts to the Twitter opportunity, and you don&#8217;t see the second one unless you know about it. I&#8217;ve had all sorts of businesses contact me when I twitter about something because these businesses are constant running SEARCHES against all Twitters for keywords. When they find something, they send that person an email (or Twitter). It&#8217;s the ultimate one-on-one marketing.</p>
<p>Go to Google and type <em>Twitter Search</em> and you&#8217;ll see all kinds of search engines. In fact, Twitter actually purchased a specialized Twitter Search software company that has been integrated into Twitter &#8211; see <a href="http://search.twitter.com/" title="http://search.twitter.com/">http://search.twitter.com/</a>.Â </p>
<p>The business leverage here is getting more intimate with people who are exposing so much about their daily lives (business and personal) that you can hook into this and engage with them. Answer questions, help them out, solve a problem for them, sell them a product they are looking for, fix something broken they are complaining about.</p>
<p>I tell you, when someone pops up in your email box telling you they saw a Twitter you posted and they are offering some help, it just about blows you away. This is true for B-to-B and B-to-C.</p>
<p>Another feature is the list of hot topics that are shown at <a href="http://search.twitter.com/" title="http://search.twitter.com/">http://search.twitter.com/</a>, so go exploring and see what&#8217;s possible for you and your business on Twitter.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.refreshweb.com/blog/2008/10/21/two-questions-about-twitter-answered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
